Negotiations Over Time in a Multi-Agent Environment: Preliminary Report
نویسندگان
چکیده
One of the major foci of research in distributed artificial intelligence (DAI) is the design of automated agents which can interact effectively in order to cooperate in problem-solving. Negotiation is recognized as an important means by which inter-agent cooperation is achieved. In this paper we suggest a strategic model of negotiation for N agents (N > 3), that takes the passage of time during the negotiation process itself into consideration. Changes in the agent's preferences over time will change their strategies in the negotiation and, as a result, the agreements they are willing to reach. We will show that in this model the delay in reaching such agreements can be shortened and in some cases avoided altogether. 1 Introduction One of the major foci of research in distributed artificial intelligence (DAI) is the design of automated agents which can interact effectively in order to cooperate in problem-solving. Negotiation is recognized as an important means by which inter-agent cooperation is achieved. That is, DAI is concerned with the design of agents which are able to communicate in such a way as to enhance the possibility of reaching mutually beneficial agreements concerning problems such as a division of labor or resources among the agents. Negotiation has always been a central theme in DAI This research has focused on strategies for designing agents capable of reaching mutually beneficial agreements. Sycara ([Sycara, 1987]), using case-based reasoning , and Kraus et al. ([Kraus et al., 1991J) modeled negotiations from a cognitive standpoint. Yet it is also recognized that although negotiations are necessary for reaching such agreements, the negotiation process is both costly and time-consuming, and thus may increase the overhead of the operation in question (see [Bond and Gasser, 1988]). In negotiations on such issues as job-sharing or resource allocation, it is important to minimize the amount of time spent on negotiating mutually beneficial agreements so as not to detract from time spent on the task itself. Thus, in the presence of time constraints, negotiation time should be taken into consideration. In [Kraus and Wilkenfeld, 1991a] we propose a strategic model of negotiation that takes the passage of time during the negotiation process itself into consideration. That study focused exclusively on a two-agent model. The present study generalizes this process by considering the N-agent environment. Kraus and Wilkenfeld, 1991a] we examine negotiation using game theory techniques with appropriate modifications to fit artificial intelligence situations. We …
منابع مشابه
Single-Agent Therapy for Low Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (LRGTN): A Preliminary Report on a Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Pulse-Methotrexate versus Pulse-Dactinomycin
The efficacy of single-agent chemotherapy for patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTN) with methotrexate or dactinomycin is well established, but efforts continue to reduce the toxicity, the patients time and cost of treatment. In a randomized clinical trial, we evaluated and compared the efficacy, toxicity and cost effectiveness of pulse-methotrexate versus pulse-dact...
متن کاملMeta-level Coordination for Solving Distributed Negotiation Chains in Semi-cooperative Multi-agent Systems
A negotiation chain is formed when multiple related negotiations are spread over multiple agents. In order to appropriately order and structure the negotiations occurring in the chain so as to optimize the expected utility, we present an extension to a single-agent concurrent negotiation framework. This work is aimed at semi-cooperative multi-agent systems, where each agent has its own goals an...
متن کاملDesign and Evaluation of Agent-Based Negotiation Heuristic for Online Negotiations
This paper presents a negotiation heuristic for software agents that enable agents to learn about the opponent’s behavior and use market information while conducting online negotiations. The heuristic is tested in a pilot experimental study, where the performance of agents is evaluated with respect to human negotiators in a simulated electronic market. Preliminary results indicate that agents m...
متن کاملInvestigating adaptive, confidence-based strategic negotiations in complex multiagent environments
We propose an adaptive 1-to-many negotiation strategy for multiagent coalition formation in complex environments that are dynamic, uncertain, and real-time. Our strategy deals with how to assign multiple issues to a set of concurrent negotiations based on an initiating agent’s confidence in its profiling of its peer agents. When an agent is confident, it uses a packaged approach—conducting mult...
متن کاملAdaptive, Confidence-Based Strategic Negotiations in Complex Multiagent Environments
We have designed and implemented an adaptive, confidence-based negotiation strategy for conducting multiple, concurrent negotiations among agents in dynamic, uncertain, and real-time environments. Our strategy deals with how to assign multiple issues to a set of concurrent negotiations. When an agent is confident about a particular peer agent, it uses a packaged approach by negotiating on multi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1991